[CivicAccess-discuss] inviations? + tranlated letter + plans?

[Michael Lenczner]

yeah - i think that should work.  especially because to edit the wiki
you will be required to sign-in - so that will help us keep track of
people.

actually - let me re-think that. maybe it's a better idea not to send
that info around.  How about we use the same password for everyone,
but to find out the address of the site, the mailing list, the
password to get to the wiki - they have to respond to that email
address.  It adds a bit of human touch, makes the barrier a bit higher
(which is good as long as we tell them that they decided later whether
they want to be co-founders) and it should less the impact of the
email forwarding that is bound to happen.

so we each would have to deal with the people we invited individually
- but they each would get the same password.  (except for using the
wiki - where they would have to set up an account).

if we split the invitees in 4 that works out well in terms of each of
them having someone to contact and none of us being overwhelmed.

?  good? / bad?




On 12/13/05, Patrick Dinnen <pdinnen at gmail.com> wrote:
> One small practical question. Where we say in the invites that people
> should contact Stephane or I for Wiki/mailing list passwords. I assume
> that we're going to give out the standard user/password to everyone.
> If that's right is there any reason not to include the login details
> in the invite? We could add a request that people not pass the login
> around. That would be one less barrier to people getting involved and
> take some work off Stephane and I.
>
> Patrick
>