[CivicAccess-discuss] change of password + invitees

[Tracey P. Lauriault]

Patrick Dinnen wrote:

>I would tend to keep Joe Murray, the fairvote.ca guy, on the list for
>a couple of reasons: he seems to have good contacts in political
>information in general and specifically asked to be included. Plus he
>comes recommended by Phillip Smith, who is usually a good judge of
>relevant people I think. However I'm not 100% fixed that he should be
>included, at least in the first wave, whatever people think.
>  
>
sounds good.

>Patrick
>
>On 12/13/05, Michael Lenczner <mlenczner at gmail.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>stephane - could you change the username and password to:
>>
>>civicaccess
>>and
>>libre
>>
>>I want to put some of the finishing touches on before we send out this
>>email.  and that includes making the site less predominantly anglo.
>>
>>Re: invitees
>>http://www.civicaccess.ca/wiki/Launch/PossibleCoFounders
>>
>>1) i would be for removing the person from "fairvote.ca" because there
>>seems to be no connetion to open anything from their group.  They seem
>>to be more concerned with having a directly numerically
>>representational gov so that the smaller provinces have less power.  I
>>don't think adding it is a good idea - and I'm not sure what his group
>>would bring as input?  Is this okay to remove - or am i not seeing
>>something?
>>
>>2) tracey - the names that you suggested - are they all people that
>>need to be at this stage as co-founders or are some of them people
>>that could join in once we have lauched?  it's great that you have
>>some contacts outside of ontario and quebec.
>>    
>>
not everyone is for co-founders many can join when launched.  I will try 
to keep the geodiversity folks in.

>>3) i erased a few names to try to trim it down.  It is important to
>>remember that the invitees will suggest other names after we contact
>>them but before we launch.  I don't think we should add all of them,
>>but there will probably be a few people that will be important to add
>>as co-founders - out of respect to the work that they already do in
>>the area.  does that make sense?
>>
>>I'm working on the letter now.  I'm going to keep all of tracey's
>>edits except one - i think.
>>
>>I also remembered to add to the letter that if they join the mailing
>>list they are not aggreeing to be co-founders.  They can join us in
>>the discussion and then they can choose to be co-founders when we
>>launch after x-mas.
>>
>>right?
>>
>>i'll send the invite for a another review in the next hour.
>>
>>mike
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
>>CivicAccess-discuss at civicaccess.ca
>>http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
>CivicAccess-discuss at civicaccess.ca
>http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca
>
>  
>