[CivicAccess-discuss] change of password + invitees

[Michael Lenczner]

yeah - i'm okay with keeping him too.  i went back and looked at the
site and didnt' see anything to object to.


On 12/13/05, Tracey P. Lauriault <tlauriau at magma.ca> wrote:
> Patrick Dinnen wrote:
>
> >I would tend to keep Joe Murray, the fairvote.ca guy, on the list for
> >a couple of reasons: he seems to have good contacts in political
> >information in general and specifically asked to be included. Plus he
> >comes recommended by Phillip Smith, who is usually a good judge of
> >relevant people I think. However I'm not 100% fixed that he should be
> >included, at least in the first wave, whatever people think.
> >
> >
> sounds good.
>
> >Patrick
> >
> >On 12/13/05, Michael Lenczner <mlenczner at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>stephane - could you change the username and password to:
> >>
> >>civicaccess
> >>and
> >>libre
> >>
> >>I want to put some of the finishing touches on before we send out this
> >>email.  and that includes making the site less predominantly anglo.
> >>
> >>Re: invitees
> >>http://www.civicaccess.ca/wiki/Launch/PossibleCoFounders
> >>
> >>1) i would be for removing the person from "fairvote.ca" because there
> >>seems to be no connetion to open anything from their group.  They seem
> >>to be more concerned with having a directly numerically
> >>representational gov so that the smaller provinces have less power.  I
> >>don't think adding it is a good idea - and I'm not sure what his group
> >>would bring as input?  Is this okay to remove - or am i not seeing
> >>something?
> >>
> >>2) tracey - the names that you suggested - are they all people that
> >>need to be at this stage as co-founders or are some of them people
> >>that could join in once we have lauched?  it's great that you have
> >>some contacts outside of ontario and quebec.
> >>
> >>
> not everyone is for co-founders many can join when launched.  I will try
> to keep the geodiversity folks in.
>
> >>3) i erased a few names to try to trim it down.  It is important to
> >>remember that the invitees will suggest other names after we contact
> >>them but before we launch.  I don't think we should add all of them,
> >>but there will probably be a few people that will be important to add
> >>as co-founders - out of respect to the work that they already do in
> >>the area.  does that make sense?
> >>
> >>I'm working on the letter now.  I'm going to keep all of tracey's
> >>edits except one - i think.
> >>
> >>I also remembered to add to the letter that if they join the mailing
> >>list they are not aggreeing to be co-founders.  They can join us in
> >>the discussion and then they can choose to be co-founders when we
> >>launch after x-mas.
> >>
> >>right?
> >>
> >>i'll send the invite for a another review in the next hour.
> >>
> >>mike
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> >>CivicAccess-discuss at civicaccess.ca
> >>http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> >CivicAccess-discuss at civicaccess.ca
> >http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CivicAccess-discuss mailing list
> CivicAccess-discuss at civicaccess.ca
> http://civicaccess.ca/mailman/listinfo/civicaccess-discuss_civicaccess.ca
>